Advertisement
Hi everyone. I'm in the process of creating a new church. It'll take a while to get people though, 'cause my views are not very popular.
I believe that God has a plan to save mankind. Jesus' Apostles were on the right track when they started a shared income commune as the book of Acts talks about, but the time wasn't right for them back then, and also there were missing a vital piece of the puzzle.
I'm guessing that many of you here know that Jesus was an Anarcho-Communist, or whatever term you want to use. The Apostle Paul, however, was the exact opposite. Paul strongly believed in top down leadership, saying that leaders are "ordained by God" and that not bowing down to them is a sin. According to Paul, Hitler was ordained by God, and that is the exact opposite of what Jesus taught us. I believe Paul is the Anti-christ.
So, I have the very difficult task of trying to find people willing to reject Paul and accept Jesus. That is an extremely dificult task, 'cause just about everything taught by the churches is from Paul.
I see strong evidence that long ago some people throughly researched and understood much of the Bible, but that doesn't seem to be the case nowdays. I did a search for proof of the existance of God, and it seems that no one thinks there is such proof, yet the Bible is full of it. The Bible gives proof in the form of predictions of future events, like the Birth of Christ, for example, but modern ministers don't seem to know of it.
For example, "Then what had been spoken through Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not." Matthew 2:17 and 18.
That was a prediction of the events surrounding the birth of Jesus. That one is obvious, 'cause they come straight out and say it was predicted. I suspect though, you'd have a hard time finding a minister who knows what Rachel's part is in it. The center references in some Bibles show that biblical scholars long ago knew this stuff. At the time of Jesus' birth, the people who needed to know knew about that the prediction shows proof of the existence of God, but now people don't seem to think there is any proof.
Anyway, enough of that.
Tony
I believe that God has a plan to save mankind. Jesus' Apostles were on the right track when they started a shared income commune as the book of Acts talks about, but the time wasn't right for them back then, and also there were missing a vital piece of the puzzle.
I'm guessing that many of you here know that Jesus was an Anarcho-Communist, or whatever term you want to use. The Apostle Paul, however, was the exact opposite. Paul strongly believed in top down leadership, saying that leaders are "ordained by God" and that not bowing down to them is a sin. According to Paul, Hitler was ordained by God, and that is the exact opposite of what Jesus taught us. I believe Paul is the Anti-christ.
So, I have the very difficult task of trying to find people willing to reject Paul and accept Jesus. That is an extremely dificult task, 'cause just about everything taught by the churches is from Paul.
I see strong evidence that long ago some people throughly researched and understood much of the Bible, but that doesn't seem to be the case nowdays. I did a search for proof of the existance of God, and it seems that no one thinks there is such proof, yet the Bible is full of it. The Bible gives proof in the form of predictions of future events, like the Birth of Christ, for example, but modern ministers don't seem to know of it.
For example, "Then what had been spoken through Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not." Matthew 2:17 and 18.
That was a prediction of the events surrounding the birth of Jesus. That one is obvious, 'cause they come straight out and say it was predicted. I suspect though, you'd have a hard time finding a minister who knows what Rachel's part is in it. The center references in some Bibles show that biblical scholars long ago knew this stuff. At the time of Jesus' birth, the people who needed to know knew about that the prediction shows proof of the existence of God, but now people don't seem to think there is any proof.
Anyway, enough of that.
Tony
posted by:
|
Ukraine
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
